Dance Magazine: Some of the largest financial awards a dance artist can win are the ones you can’t even apply for. You’re simply told one day that you’ve won, say, up to $550,000, in the case of the Doris Duke Artist Award, or $800,000, in the case of the MacArthur “genius grant.” And those two grants are almost entirely unrestricted, meaning that after paying taxes on the money, artists can do whatever they want with it, personal or artistic—buy a house, fund a new piece, pay off debts, grow their company.
6 comments:
This article explores how receiving large, often unexpected grants impacted five dance artists, both personally and professionally. A key takeaway is that while financial windfalls offered freedom from debt and stress, they also introduced new responsibilities and perspectives on money. Donald Byrd found liberation from tax debt and the emotional toll it caused, while Michelle Dorrance gained stability for her dance company and a sense of obligation to give back. Similarly, Miguel Gutierrez used his grant to secure housing and shift his long-term outlook. However, artists like Rosie Herrera and Annabelle Lopez Ochoa acknowledged the complexity of investing in themselves while maintaining creative goals.These artists experienced both empowerment and pressure—revealing how money influences artistic and personal decisions. I learned that even unrestricted grants create a balancing act between sustainability, community impact, and personal growth.
The arts have always been an industry that favors the rich and unrestricted, and though that does not exclude people with financial restrictions from creating beautiful things, it certainly makes it more difficult, and stressful. This article highlights that. The starving artist caricature, while heavily flawed, came about for a reason. To me, this article highlights the importance of, in the beginning of my career, having a day job, and as I become more successful, being aware of my financial standing, not quitting that day job until I know I can be comfortable without it, and not being afraid to go back to it, all so I don't need to be praying to win the lottery in order to have stability. We chose this career knowing the financial perils of it, but that doesn't mean we all have to embody the 'fully committed' artist that this article highlights. I commend these people for their commitment to the craft, but my biggest takeaway is to be aware of my finances throughout my career, not just after I win a grant.
It was interesting to note that people used their grant money first to fund their art and then the second grant went towards protecting their personal livelihoods. It’s a sight to see artists putting their craft first, and that's probably why they got the money in the first place, the undying commitment to the craft. On the other hand, it is sad to see that money makes craft and art possible and that random large sums of money can be one of the only ways to keep the business afloat as some people were mentioning the grant money did. Luck is such a large part of an artists success, at least that's what a lot of people say, but more often than not it is the access to funds that propels an artist forward. The random lottery system of grants I assume helps with not perpetuating forwards those who already had the means, but it is kind of nerve-wracking how uncertain coming into this money is, if it comes at all.
Funding is one of the major restrictions in the world of art, especially dance. That's why it's always lovely to hear about talented artists and choreographers winning life changing amounts of money to honor their work. What I found particularly interesting in this article was the lack of restrictions on the money that many of these people won. Many of the artists used their winnings to both progress their career studio and community while also investing in themselves by paying off taxes and investing in new york apartments. When artists are given flexibility in funding, especially when it's a substantial amount of money they are able to use the money where it really matters. But most of these artists have a different view of money due to the lack of it they have experienced. This view of money allows them to use it where they feel it will actually progress their career. Whether that is by investing in themselves or their dance community the money is put to good use.
This article really gave me insight on how these large grants can change people's lives for the better, giving them an outlet to be more financially stable, which goes hand in hand with being able to express overall artistic desirability. For certain people mentioned throughout this article, the Doris Duke Artist Award relieved one artist of massive tax debt, allowing him to focus on his creative work without financial anxiety. Something I think a lot of artists alike wish for, but by people banding together and helping to create these funds for people, stories highlight how unpredictable funding in the arts can be, and with only a few receiving significant support, it further allows this financial burden to turn into creative freedom. These stories go to highlight how unpredictable funding in the arts can be. You never know what you're going to get in some situations, and it's all about working with what you're given, and sometimes that's the beauty of it all. However, these grants are more than just financial relief—they also offer artists the space to think about their long-term goals and the logistics behind their art.
Unfortunately art is something that gives life and creates passion, but doesn't always pay the bills. People are so inspired by art and many just want to spend the rest of their lives creating and sharing their passion with others. But that often comes with many financial hardships and it's not feasible for a lot of people. As revealed in the article, these grants are able to help a lot of people out and give them the ability to continue on with pursuing their passion and not be forced to give up on their dreams due to financial hardships. One of the artists in the article stated that many people are just hoping their debt doesn't catch up to them, that they are not poverty stricken by the time they die.
I think it's also really important that most of these grants don't have any restrictions on them. It gives the recipients freedom to use it how they need and relieve some of the financial stress they are facing.
Post a Comment