Techdirt: Copyright seems to be a fixture of our legal, economic and social systems. For 300 years, it has formed the backbone of the structures used to incentivize and remunerate creators. During that time, copyright has been extended repeatedly in length and breadth. The original term of the 1710 Statute of Anne – 14 years’ monopoly protection with a provision for renewal for a further 14 years – has blossomed into life plus 70 years for much of the world.
1 comment:
The article highlights the challenges and opportunities that arise from new technologies and business models and raises the possibility that copyright law may need to evolve in order to keep pace with these changes.
What's particularly insightful about the article is the way in which it challenges us to think critically about the purpose and function of copyright law. While copyright has traditionally been viewed as a means of protecting the rights of creators and incentivizing the production of new works, the article suggests that this may not always be the case.
As new technologies and platforms emerge, we may need to re-evaluate the role of copyright law in society and consider new approaches to balancing the interests of creators, consumers, and the public at large. This could include alternative models of compensation for creators, such as crowdfunding or subscription-based platforms, as well as a greater emphasis on fair use and user-generated content.
Post a Comment