Community, Leadership, Experimentation, Diversity, & Education
Pittsburgh Arts, Regional Theatre, New Work, Producing, Copyright, Labor Unions,
New Products, Coping Skills, J-O-Bs...
Theatre industry news, University & School of Drama Announcements, plus occasional course support for
Carnegie Mellon School of Drama Faculty, Staff, Students, and Alumni.
CMU School of Drama
Tuesday, March 08, 2011
Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to Law That Removes Works from the Public Domain
Electronic Frontier Foundation: "Today the Supreme Court agreed to hear an important case about whether Congress has the power to 'restore' copyright protection to works that already exist in the public domain. To be clear, for more than 200 years the law has been settled – once a work was in the public domain, there it remained, and downstream users could feel free to use, store, or share it any way they saw fit. Now Congress, in enacting Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, is changing the game by granting copyright protection to works by foreign authors that, for a variety of reasons, were no longer protected by copyright (for example, if an author had failed to renew her copyright). This means that many works already in the public domain – Peter the Wolf, literature by Maxim Gorky, pieces by Picasso, and music by Stravinski, for example – that have been used and performed countless times would now be subject to copyright protection. Those who have used the works could now be required to pay hefty license fees, and – even worse – if they can’t afford those fees, cease use of the works.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I wish this article gave more information on which works and why this is happening now. It would be nice to have a context for this.
I dont think that it should be allowed because its not right for something that has always been free, like shakespeare, to now have cost money. Where would the profits go? I hate it when things like this happen. I hate people who take things that have always been free to gain a profit they dont deserve...
I agree with Dev. This is going to be a very difficult law to enforce. I can understand with protecting works that failed to have their copyright renewed but works that were created 80 years ago (i.e. Peter and the Wolf) would seem ludicrous to try and re-instate their copyright protection. I am not sure what kind of royalties Prokofieb or his family would be getting anyway.
Post a Comment