Architect Magazine: In Washington, D.C., where monuments are typically treated as untouchable symbols of national continuity, a legal battle is unfolding that could redefine how the United States treats its architectural legacy. At the center of the fight is the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts—a building that is not only a cultural institution but a national memorial—and a sweeping set of proposed changes by Donald Trump that critics say threaten to irreversibly alter it.
The architecture of America in general is already pretty modern, which I noticed was a big contrast from across Europe. I feel like across Europe there are so many old buildings, to the point where entire towns have only historical buildings, and even to the point where this was a normal occurrence. Then in America, I am more familiar with large residential neighborhoods where every building has been made in the past 5 to 10 years and looks exactly the same. I guess because of this, I am surprised when I see pushback about changing historical buildings. Maybe it is a sort of desensitization, but maybe the nationwide focus on the history of the Kennedy Center will create a greater awareness of the importance of these historic buildings. I wonder what role the public has in these sorts of legal processes. The article vaguely mentions federal laws which creates a sort of pathway for the public to voice their opinions on any changes made to historical buildings.
ReplyDelete